Punch list

• Does it clearly identify the typographer (full name / legible)
     william caslon. is identified in the design and layout of his work.

• Are the (3) examples of their work clear, crisp and identified? 
     leather press wheel, type, propaganda 

• Is the typography strong? so-so? weak? non-existent?
     the type is strong and legible, easy to read even viewing the old paper containing his type.

• Evaluate the poster grid. Is the layout balanced? If so why? If not, why?
     the poster is balanced. it contains info and picture of the typographer and on the other side contains his work and the calendar made to look his work. 

• Is the bio paragraph well-positioned? Legible?
     the bio is by the typographer, showing a face with the knowledge of who it is. since the type is made to be legible so is the wording in his bio.

• Identify the color palette. What does the color scheme relate to?
     most of the poster is going to be in black and white, with a bit of tan color look from the way paper was processed during the time paper was made. 

• How are the images /portrait treated? Does the style make sense for the typographer? 
     the images show the technology used during the time of use. the style is made to look like how things will look from the time of the typographer

• Is the style loyal to the time period?
     the style is made and stayed in the time period that it was created.

• What elements, if any, could be strengthened?
    spacing of the sprockets in the week, using a old style paper background. 

this grade would be given as an incomplete C